Posted under General
Imagine_Breaker said:
I don't remember maybe 6 months more or less, some days ago i have a post with that issue, pixiv have problems too the best way to dodge that is using the manually update and copy the link personally i do that
Example post #46583 and x link using fetch source data actually I notice i created this artist based on twitter link x link generate other artist name
...
That's weird. I dunno what the different names thing is about.
SONYA said:
...
That's weird. I dunno what the different names thing is about.
Yeah i f*** there i create a alias but I'm looking that now but the method to update using a x links work the fetch mark the image like other artist probably i will need hept to fix my mistake here
Updated
Imagine_Breaker said:
Yeah i f*** there i create a alias but I'm looking that now but the method to update using a x links work the fetch mark the image like other artist probably i will need hept to fix my mistake here
And i found the twitter.com and X.com artist not generate other name but for the site aren't the same artist i found this when i was trying to solve my mistakes
Anyone have any idea what might be wrong with this upload?
post #47636
Or this one?
post #47641
Or this one?
post #47695
Or really any of the ones that have been pending for 2 days?
Joleo9 said:
Anyone have any idea what might be wrong with this upload?
post #47636
Or this one?
post #47641
Or this one?
post #47695
Or really any of the ones that have been pending for 2 days?
post #47636 - Small resolution, faux watermark, bad hand, and then the most glaring problem, the legs. I cannot even describe how they are wrong as they are a complete mess, just take a second look yourself.
post #47641 - I don't really see any big issue, simply not my taste.
post #47695 - Not my taste either, but the eyes are also broken-looking and the thing the character is holding is confusing. It kind of looks like a broken, extremely long fingernail.
Also, please refrain from posting pending posts in this topic, as they still have a chance of getting approved.
Lyren said:
post #47636 - Small resolution, faux watermark, bad hand, and then the most glaring problem, the legs. I cannot even describe how they are wrong as they are a complete mess, just take a second look yourself.
post #47641 - I don't really see any big issue, simply not my taste.
post #47695 - Not my taste either, but the eyes are also broken-looking and the thing the character is holding is confusing. It kind of looks like a broken, extremely long fingernail.
Also, please refrain from posting pending posts in this topic, as they still have a chance of getting approved.
Okay. Also, I never noticed the third leg, oops.
what is wrong with post #47141 ? it did so well...
ydel said:
what is wrong with post #47141 ? it did so well...
The limbs don't feel like they connect properly - her right leg and right arm. For the minor issues, there's skin-colored hair next to her right shoulder and a little bit broken ear(s).
Hi, I'm looking for feedback on my recent set of rejected uploads so I might post something worthy, specifically
post #48527
post #48525
post #48524
Totally see how this could get rejected for the hand, what could I do to fix it? Having trouble visualizing how it should really look here. Also, what's most messed up about it? Furthest finger to the left is funky, but also the hand orientation with regard to the non-existent thumb is off. In short, just need more specific feedback so I can fix it and do better :)
SilkToad said:
Hi, I'm looking for feedback on my recent set of rejected uploads so I might post something worthy, specifically
post #48527
post #48525
post #48524
1st post: Her right hand has a few errors, most notable the weird pinky finger. Her hair is merging with the collarbone and the glasses are wonky.
2nd post: One eye has a lot of eyelashes, the other one has none. Her right elbow is confusing, but the biggest issue of the image is the guy's left foot.
3rd post: I don't see anything that would prevent the image being unapproved quality wise (only error I see is the weird detached hair piece under her collarbone) I just don't like the derpy expression. Other approvers might feel the same or have some other personal preferences why it wasn't approved.
komorebi said:
Totally see how this could get rejected for the hand, what could I do to fix it? Having trouble visualizing how it should really look here. Also, what's most messed up about it? Furthest finger to the left is funky, but also the hand orientation with regard to the non-existent thumb is off. In short, just need more specific feedback so I can fix it and do better :)
The furthest one to the right looks like an index finger rather than a thumb, so the assumption is that there is a thumb on the other side of the hand, making the finger count 6. Inpainting or manual editing one of the fingers out would probably fix the hand, for more feedback you can join the AIBooru Discord linked on the footer. Looking closer, one part of the thighhigh is detached from the leg which would confirm there is a thumb that is performing a thighhighs pull.
The furthest one to the right looks like an index finger rather than a thumb, so the assumption is that there is a thumb on the other side of the hand, making the finger count 6. Inpainting or manual editing one of the fingers out would probably fix the hand, for more feedback you can join the AIBooru Discord linked on the footer. Looking closer, one part of the thighhigh is detached from the leg which would confirm there is a thumb that is performing a thighhighs pull.
Okay, that totally makes sense now. The difference is huge. Thoughts on this? If it's good, any way I could replace the image on my original upload with it?: https://files.catbox.moe/2xvu0r.jpg
komorebi said:
Okay, that totally makes sense now. The difference is huge. Thoughts on this? If it's good, any way I could replace the image on my original upload with it?: https://files.catbox.moe/2xvu0r.jpg
Looks good now. Moderators & Admins can replace the image, but as the image is different from the sourced image (Pixiv in this case) it is preferred to re-upload the image as a different post, tag it as revision and add it as a parent to this previous post.
Lyren said:
Looks good now. Moderators & Admins can replace the image, but as the image is different from the sourced image (Pixiv in this case) it is preferred to re-upload the image as a different post, tag it as revision and add it as a parent to this previous post.
Gotcha. I'll probably just re-upload to Pixiv rn as a revision and then re-post here under parent. Thanks for the help!
Darcetos said:
Please tell me what is wrong with the post ID: 50176, why is it not approved?
The only thing that bothers me is that the pupils feel weird/off-putting, but it is enough for me to dislike the image. They have very asymmetrical irises.
Wondering about post #50277, I'm assuming it's due to some issues with her hair in the back and issues with her earring(s)?
Lopi999 said:
Wondering about post #50277, I'm assuming it's due to some issues with her hair in the back and issues with her earring(s)?
It's the overall chaos & smudginess around that area yes. The earrings, the vision & detached collar have no clear shape or form, just a mush of lines together. The hair is also suffering from the same thing on her bangs, hair flaps, & sidelocks especially. Extra lines above her left eye as well, and as a more minor thing the eyebrows are completely different length.
Enigmata said:
Hello. I don't know why my arts are deleted.
My followers and users of my LoRAs like my arts.
Is aibooru too good for it?
post #51205 - Very bad hands (Inconsistent fingernails, and the fingers don't really connect to the palm. Head also feels quite small compared to the body.
post #51206 - Thumb merging with the suitcase, jpeg artifacts.
post #51207 - bad left hand, and 6 fingers on at least right hand, not sure about the left one due to fingers coming out straight out of the palm and all. Also heavy jpeg artifacts.
post #51208 - Personally I don't like it, no flaws that I can spot though.
post #51209 - Not for my taste either, but on top of that there is jpeg artifacts and a missing hand. Her neck has some weird line and grey tint to it, and inconsistent shadowing below that.
Blob said:
Could I please have general feedback on all of the images that were not approved due to not being approved within 3 days so I can avoid such instances in the future?
The furry images are most likely disapproved by all moderators who saw it that time by general taste. In such cases it's recommended to appeal after a month to few months in case there are other moderators active at that time.
post #51792 - The left thumb is very thin, and the ring finger is splitting in two after the joint.
post #51789 - Hand again. The image you posted in the other thread is approvable.
post #51767 - Thumb splitting in half (right hand), extra finger-like skin deform running across the leg (left hand)
post #51766 - 4 fingers each hand, although it is consistent as it is both hands, but the thickness of each hands' fingers are vastly different. Right hand's pinky finger is also disjointed badly (and very long compared to the other fingers).
hi guys, in response to requesting an appeal about my image, I would like if a broader judgment could be given about the image that I uploaded to the site, which has been classified as loli realistic, but I consider that this is not the case , it should be noted that the code I have the AI, and the image shows that it is a computer image and that it is a design that is not realistic but well defined in pixels only. If more moderators could comment on the matter, to know their judgment on the image, since I consider that the image is really more of the Petite type than the Loli reaistic type.
There are also examples of images of girls with small bodies on the platform, and I would like the image to be reevaluated and seen with the petite tag, as is the case with these images of Antlers and Kenji Ai:
DarkL0lik0n69 said:
hi guys, in response to requesting an appeal about my image, I would like if a broader judgment could be given about the image that I uploaded to the site, which has been classified as loli realistic, but I consider that this is not the case , it should be noted that the code I have the AI, and the image shows that it is a computer image and that it is a design that is not realistic but well defined in pixels only. If more moderators could comment on the matter, to know their judgment on the image, since I consider that the image is really more of the Petite type than the Loli reaistic type.
There are also examples of images of girls with small bodies on the platform, and I would like the image to be reevaluated and seen with the petite tag, as is the case with these images of Antlers and Kenji Ai:
It is clear they are made by an AI, otherwise your posts would have been tagged off-topic.
Realistic & photorealistic are tags to describe the style of the image, not that they are photographs. There is also a reason why there are two of these tags: realistic is very clearly still not a photograph, but has elements to realism such as smaller eyes than anime & more realistic lighting than the typical flat anime lighting (such as anime coloring). It is enough for a post to be in realistic style and not photorealistic to be labeled as realistic loli.
---
As for the loli/petite issue, as you said you want others' opinion on it than mine, so not going to say any more about it, but note that as loli wiki says,
of girls who appear to be preadolescent (roughly between the age of 3 to 12)
images you have posted are more in this range and post #34875 & post #38849 which yes, look underage, but not as young as the loli definition.
Hello I'm here to request a appeal on post #54255 which was deleted due to being unapproved for 3 days. Thanks.
jurassicparklionkingfan said:
Hello I'm here to request a appeal on post #54255 which was deleted due to being unapproved for 3 days. Thanks.
You don't need to request to make an appeal, just appeal the post and it'll run through the queue again.
jurassicparklionkingfan said:
oh, I see. That's my bad. The boorus I've been on have both an appeal option on the post and a appeal thread on the forums to give users more options.
Not a problem. I kinda figured that's what it was considering you're from ATF and they do that.
Anyway, this thread is generally to receive feedback on why an upload wasn't approved. Making an appeal here is an entirely separate thing.
ANJU said:
Not a problem. I kinda figured that's what it was considering you're from ATF and they do that.
Anyway, this thread is generally to receive feedback on why an upload wasn't approved. Making an appeal here is an entirely separate thing.
Understandable. Noted for the future.
Hi,
No action recently on my uploads. Those will get deleted very soon.
Any specific feedback?
https://aibooru.online/posts?tags=user%3Aeisenbricher+status%3Apending
Specific posts
post #54970
post #54969
post #54967
post #54873
post #54871
post #54870
post #54970
post #54969
- bad hands
post #54873
- Her breast has a mouth-looking thing. It does look like a burn-mark/scar, so I wouldn't see it as an error, but some approvers might press disapprove because of that.
post #54871
- Her foot has a big rock stuck in it.
post #54870
- Both extra finger & bad feet
And as pointed out before, please do not use this thread before the images are actually deleted as they still have a chance to get approved. A lot of the approvers only check the bottom of the queue, not the other way around.
Lyren said:
post #54970
post #54969
- bad handspost #54873
- Her breast has a mouth-looking thing. It does look like a burn-mark/scar, so I wouldn't see it as an error, but some approvers might press disapprove because of that.post #54871
- Her foot has a big rock stuck in it.post #54870
- Both extra finger & bad feetAnd as pointed out before, please do not use this thread before the images are actually deleted as they still have a chance to get approved. A lot of the approvers only check the bottom of the queue, not the other way around.
My bad, didn't notice your earlier message
Any feedback on post #56482? I had similar posts to this one that were approved, just looking to see how I can improve my later gens.
GENTLEPOKEGIRLFUCKER said:
Any feedback on post #56482? I had similar posts to this one that were approved, just looking to see how I can improve my later gens.
Approved, some of the approvers haven't been as active lately so it just slipped through the cracks. On an unrelated note, remember to tag self-upload when applicable.
Lyren said:
Approved, some of the approvers haven't been as active lately so it just slipped through the cracks. On an unrelated note, remember to tag self-upload when applicable.
Thanks, will do!
nzvemnvz said:
Hi. Why my post#56924 getting rejected although i have put some detail? Is there any biased decision over.image selection over there?
Or my image doesn't enough explicit to approve that?
check this media asset: https://aibooru.online/media_assets/230920
Updated
I have a question for you all. If i generate i really nice picture but it have some minor errors or bad renders like fused fingers or a gistorted ear, is the mindset "this promt with this model will result in this image" better? Or should i just polish it in photoshop and inpaint? but it will not be genuine to the metadata and not easily replicated ? in another words should i value publishing good promts or good art more?
noppersnop said:
I have a question for you all. If i generate i really nice picture but it have some minor errors or bad renders like fused fingers or a gistorted ear, is the mindset "this promt with this model will result in this image" better? Or should i just polish it in photoshop and inpaint? but it will not be genuine to the metadata and not easily replicated ? in another words should i value publishing good promts or good art more?
Since the art is the focus, image quality should be the priority.
I think the best solution is posting only the revised version, but leaving the originals as unposted media assets that you can link to in the comments of the posts you upload. That way you can keep the originals with accurate metadata and not risk having deleted uploads because of errors like that.
noppersnop said:
I have a question for you all. If i generate i really nice picture but it have some minor errors or bad renders like fused fingers or a gistorted ear, is the mindset "this promt with this model will result in this image" better? Or should i just polish it in photoshop and inpaint? but it will not be genuine to the metadata and not easily replicated ? in another words should i value publishing good promts or good art more?
I don't think there's an official stance on this but both approaches are valid. That said, approvers tend to be harsh on small mistakes so I think it makes more sense to make the prompt carry you 80% of the way and then fix the rest manually if you can. At least that's what I do most of the time.
AIBooru is in part a place to share the metadata but replicating images became almost impossible already with the number of variables we're working with. Main focus is just posting great images that were mostly made by AI. Describing the process as closely as possible is great but it should not be prioritized over producing sexy booba.
antlers_anon said:
I don't think there's an official stance on this but both approaches are valid. That said, approvers tend to be harsh on small mistakes so I think it makes more sense to make the prompt carry you 80% of the way and then fix the rest manually if you can. At least that's what I do most of the time.
AIBooru is in part a place to share the metadata but replicating images became almost impossible already with the number of variables we're working with. Main focus is just posting great images that were mostly made by AI. Describing the process as closely as possible is great but it should not be prioritized over producing sexy booba.
I second this notion, AIBooru to me is a place to share what I have created using AI. The purpose of tagging for me is a matter of organisation, including metadata for me is to simply show the steps I took in order to achieve what I got. It's not meant to perfectly replicate an image for me, and to be fairly honest, I don't very often see an image and want to recreate it 1:1. I usually only want to know how to achieve the same aesthetic of said image.
I know it was deleted a few days ago, but what appears to be the issue with post #57514? I notice some issues in the background, but I'm wondering if there's any issues with her body that were notable, to me, I do notice that her upper torso awkwardly bends up, but is there any other notable issues as to why it wasn't approved?
Lopi999 said:
I know it was deleted a few days ago, but what appears to be the issue with post #57514? I notice some issues in the background, but I'm wondering if there's any issues with her body that were notable, to me, I do notice that her upper torso awkwardly bends up, but is there any other notable issues as to why it wasn't approved?
The animal ear fluffs are a bit odd but that's pretty much the only thing I notice, approved.
Looking for constructive feedback on post #58210
eisenbricher said:
Looking for constructive feedback on post #58210
Everything looks great except for the right hand. Mostly the thumb and middle finger are off. At least that's the reason I'm not approving. Index finger on the left hand seems to be doubled too, but it might just be the thumb behind it so I'm not complaining about it too much.
antlers_anon said:
Everything looks great except for the right hand. Mostly the thumb and middle finger are off. At least that's the reason I'm not approving. Index finger on the left hand seems to be doubled too, but it might just be the thumb behind it so I'm not complaining about it too much.
Alright
Lasagna_AI said:
hi everyone, some moderator could try to see and accept my post? <3
Please don't ask for approvals. This thread is to get feedback on uploads.
If there's a specific post (or posts) you want reviewed then please link by writing post #1234 where "1234" is the number of your post.
Keeping the thread alive.
Any chance on getting feedback on:
The first three I'm assuming look too young and realistic? I have no idea about the latter ones.
antlers_anon said:
Any chance on getting feedback on:
post #60319 - Real reason is most likely the fact that only 1 approver had seen it. But for real errors that are a bit distracting all can be found from the background: The candelabra is hovering in the air. The table is extending so far out that is standing on top of the bed. There is a random hole on the wall above the window at the top right of the image.
post #60186 - Again, only one seen, that aside the cropping feels odd to me. Also the floor below the counter is a lot higher than the legs are, which can be explained that it is just a raise in the floor but it still feels unsettling "why is that there".
post #60178 - If you look at the elbow, it kinda looks like merging arms, other than that seems perfectly fine so it should be an easy fix.
post #59030 - Black-haired girl's stare is kinda derpy, and red hair's thumb looks like it's going through the sleeve (which could be by design but other sleeve does not do that) but also looks like a wrinkled sausage. The thigh next to the "sausage" also looks like it has a small deform.
post #57491 - Looks fine, verified.
post #54468 - Taste issue from my end, I don't see any major errors.
Can I got a check on post #60354 and post #49490
For the second one, I'm guessing watermark, but what about the first?
Hello.
What's wrong with post #60807?
Sirius_fw said:
Hello.
What's wrong with post #60807?
Approved. Remember that newest revision should be the parent, not the other way around.
@Joeyboi
in the first one the leg seems a bit too long compared to the torso but I don't think it's a bad image so I undeleted it.
The second one just doesn't look appealing to me, and I don't like how the face is cut off. Just my personal opinion, sorry I can't offer anything more constructive.
hello , i would like some the feedback on why post #58544 is deleted. Sure, the right hand is slightly distorted but i see plenty of pics approved with similar level of bad hands or worse.
Admittedly, I disagree pretty strongly with the note about the hands being weird. The hands look fine, the thumbs aren't 'missing' they're holding up the shirt from beneath the cloth. That said, I went ahead and made a new version that changed the position of the hands. Not sure how to actually go about revising the image but here's the link to the revised version.
noppersnop said:
hello , i would like some the feedback on why post #58544 is deleted. Sure, the right hand is slightly distorted but i see plenty of pics approved with similar level of bad hands or worse.
In my opinion her hip looks out of place, in addition to other small details like her ear merging with her hair, i think her hand isn't the main reason for not approving it.
Hi. I want to know why post #61936 was deleted. Fingers and hands looks normal.
GamaZ said:
Hi. I want to know why post #61936 was deleted. Fingers and hands looks normal.
I think it's her left eye looks weird but all in the post is good for me, the cloth in her hand isn't a real reason to not approve it at least for me.
I also want to know why post #61189 was deleted. Fingers and hands looks normal. Has it problem with fingers or vulva?
GamaZ said:
I also want to know why post #61189 was deleted. Has it problem with fingers or vulva?
Could I get feedback on post #63487?
Issues I noticed after posting:
- index finger on right hand
- eyeshadow on right eye
- whatever weirdness is going on in the bottom corner of her left eye
Interested in revising if approvers were mainly put off by technical errors.
SadiraM said:
Could I get feedback on post #63487?
Issues I noticed after posting:
- index finger on right hand
- eyeshadow on right eye
- whatever weirdness is going on in the bottom corner of her left eyeInterested in revising if approvers were mainly put off by technical errors.
In my case her hands looks weird in her left hand her fingers aren't defined and her right hand had a minimal issues, thats my reason, her eyes have minimal issues but isnt a reason to not approve it, at least for me
i just want to ask why my last upload got deleted? i'm not mad about this and you guys have your reasons, but i'm just curious. the girl on this image is not a loli and not even realistic. when that image got generated, i directly tried everything to remove anything too young and that checkpoint "something" can't generate anything realistic. you can compare my other uploads that got generated with this checkpoint together with "realistic".
thanks in advance...
SadiraM said:
Could I get feedback on post #63487?
Issues I noticed after posting:
- index finger on right hand
- eyeshadow on right eye
- whatever weirdness is going on in the bottom corner of her left eyeInterested in revising if approvers were mainly put off by technical errors.
Think you nailed all the big ones. Not really feedback but just something to note that novelai tends to do a lot better if you give it artist tags. The default style is just generic slush of the platonic anime girl but stylization not only gives it flavor but also interestingly will fix some hand and artifacting issues (probably since you're focusing down the embedding space).
GamaZ said:
Hi. I want to know why post #61936 was deleted. Fingers and hands looks normal.
Breast sizes are uneven
Could I please have some feedback on post #66305? I understand if it's simply unwelcomed, not a lot of this here, but pure disinterested doesn't really help me learn or correct issues.
kittycat2012 said:
Could I please have some feedback on post #66305? I understand if it's simply unwelcomed, not a lot of this here, but pure disinterested doesn't really help me learn or correct issues.
The content kind of disinterests me but that's really the main issue I have with the image. I have undeleted it.
kittycat2012 said:
Thank you!
No problem!
As a small note for the future, "disinterest" is the default disapproval reason. The reasoning behind an approver choosing that reason could range from finding an error that made someone not want to approve to just disliking the content of the image itself, and while I understand that not seeing an approver comment sometimes isn't helpful, if there isn't any it generally means they just didn't care for the image.
Considering the new approvers we have lately, if they spotted an issue I feel like they would've written it... so.. it was just bad luck on your part unfortunately, but that's why this thread and the ability to appeal exists.
Anyway... happy posting!
Any thoughts on why this was not approved?
post #66447
flurry said:
Any thoughts on why this was not approved?
post #66447
It's good art, it's already approved.
Please forgive me for the rudeness of asking such a question.
My post #67073 and few posts has been deleted. is it simply poor quality?
I'm thinking of giving up on future posts and going back to being just a viewer.
Please give me the courage to give up.
I sincerely apologize for defiling the community.
With all due respect.
Seeking feedback on post #63904 and post #66407 please!
rigidchips_nero said:
Please forgive me for the rudeness of asking such a question.
My post #67073 and few posts has been deleted. is it simply poor quality?
I'm thinking of giving up on future posts and going back to being just a viewer.
Please give me the courage to give up.
I sincerely apologize for defiling the community.
With all due respect.
No dont give up! The reason why it didnt get approved is mainly because of the face and a missing finger, I'm not sure if you're generating these locally or not, but if you are, theres a tool called "Inpainting" inside of stable diffusion that is amazing at fixing the quality if faces, as for hands (i have trouble with those as well), inpainting hands can be a gamble, but sometimes you might need to redraw a finger or hand in photoshop and then inpaint it again, i'm terrible at explaining but joining the discord server will help you a lot probably.
Also check out some tutorials on youtube on inpainting, you can search "inpaint stable diffusion hands"
Thank you very much for your kind answer!
I've tried Inpaint many times, but I've always thought it was the best result.
After receiving that advice, I think the level I should have reached was too high for me now.
It was a great experience to know that. Thank you very much.
I wish the community all the best in the future.
rigidchips_nero said:
Thank you very much for your kind answer!
I've tried Inpaint many times, but I've always thought it was the best result.
After receiving that advice, I think the level I should have reached was too high for me now.It was a great experience to know that. Thank you very much.
I wish the community all the best in the future.
As i said! Dont quit, join the server they're super helpful and willing to teach you, theres been several times where they help in voice chat, but if you quit, come back whenever you want
eisenbricher said:
Seeking feedback on post #63904 and post #66407 please!
bump... hello mods!
I need to know the feedback before uploading further content. My aim is to keep a high accept rate. Rejections pose an upload limit penalty.
Updated
eisenbricher said:
bump... hello mods!
I need to know the feedback before uploading further content. My aim is to keep a high accept rate. Rejections pose an upload limit penalty.
I'm no approver but post #63904 is a little messy in the sense that the sofa/couch thing doesnt line up and the way shes sitting is strange, other than that i think post #66407 looks fine.
screenshot: https://b.catgirlsare.sexy/xQdwhPJtFH0x.png
@eisenbricher sorry for the late reply,
I agree with sulph about the naruto one, male looks to be in a weird position, but it's not a big problem, approved it.
In the other one, the ear is broken and the strap between her breasts turns into hair at some point.
Thank you for the replies @sulph and @antlers_anon !
Hi, reason behind disapproval of this?
Any help with this one? post #68724
The almost identical child was approved
@flurry
Both images look somewhat overbaked (maybe cfg too high, maybe loras weighted too high) and there's something weird behind the girl's foot that looks like the left heel but there is no leg leading there. The face looked better on one of them (at least to me) so that's the one I approved.
@eisenbricher
For me the elbow/knee behind naruto's back was just too distracting. I don't think it should be there in the pose they are in.
How about this one? post #68858
Wondering why this post #68818 was not approved. Out of curiosity.
Space-Babes said:
Wondering why this post #68818 was not approved. Out of curiosity.
For me it's just minor things that bother too much: Ears a bit broken, the inconsistent fingernails but especially the moon that is missing a piece. It doesn't look like a gibbous moon either to me, just feels weird. With minor edits it'd be a great pic though, so I recommend editing it out and asking for a replacement in topic #172.
flurry said:
How about this one? post #68858
Faux watermark but more importantly the pussy feels very off-centered compared to the leg positions. Same as above, could be edited and replaced as it is also a good piece.
what's wrong with post #69099 ?
I don't get the "JPEG compression", img looks pretty high quality to me
post #67247
Hey, any idea why this was deleted?
Joleo9 said:
post #67247
Hey, any idea why this was deleted?
It was deleted because the the eyes have lots of artifacts, it looks like she has a third nipple, the resolution is low and maybe the approvers just dont think it looks all that appealing.
Joleo9 said:
I don't see the artifacts; can you help point them out for me please?
https://b.catgirlsare.sexy/mqTiRfE_uWWc.png
Run it through hiresfix and you'll see a difference
sulph said:
https://b.catgirlsare.sexy/mqTiRfE_uWWc.png
Run it through hiresfix and you'll see a difference
That url doesn't go anywhere.
Lyren said:
Faux watermark but more importantly the pussy feels very off-centered compared to the leg positions. Same as above, could be edited and replaced as it is also a good piece.
I will work on fixing, thanks. Will you always reject because of the faux watermark? Looks like I have few I want to post that have that, and I don't have time to re-generate all of them, might just crop to get rid of it if that is the only reason some of these are going to be deleted.
Looking for feedback on why some additional were not approved:
because watermark?
post #69143
post #69137
post #69027
post #69026
Are these rejected because of the hand position when tied up? I felt like all of them the illusion was there that the rope was hiding where they were overlapping, except for the last one, that one I missed:
post #69050
post #69042
post #69028
post #68991
Not sure what might be wrong with this one:
post #69181
Updated
gomes said:
what's wrong with post #69099 ?
I don't get the "JPEG compression", img looks pretty high quality to me
Why are you posting jpgs anyway, we have a 50mb upload limit, unless your internet is actually dogshit pngs or even webp is the better option.
I really can't figure out what's wrong with this one.
post #69304
@flurry
post #69143 - girl has two navels and the male's position looks impossible
post #69137 - girl has a bad hand
post #69027 - her hand is a bit weird but it's not terrible, approved
post #69026 - her hand is bad
in the next four the arms look broken at the wrists
post #69181 - there's a second tail on the right and her right arm i broken
@Joleo9
post #69304 - the wall behind her bends in a really weird way
Could I get some feedback on post #69411?
I know the foot in the background is a bit off, but I feel like if I tried to fix it, I'd only make it worse. Any other things here that could get this approved?
hello, i not quite sure whats wrong with post #69471
give me some advice maybe on what to avoid in future? cuz it looks fine to me. the only very minor error i could think of is her actual togtags are very slightly disconnected from the necklace.
Hi!
What's wrong?
post #69678
Sirius_fw said:
Hi!
What's wrong?
post #69678
Nothing, from what I can see. I undeleted.
What's wrong with this one? post #69938
strong_hand said:
What's wrong with this one? post #69938
I think the only issue I see is the x-ray is in a weird position.
