BUR #303 has been approved by @Lyren.
create implication happy_sex -> happy
My apologies for double-threading, forgot to pay attention to making a new post and forgot about the "Request alias/implication" thing lol. General information is in this thread: topic #266, however for sake of brevity I'll copy the contents of that thread:
Looking at the wiki, I was quite surprised to see that this implication doesn't exist, and I don't think there's any reason it shouldn't exist. Unlike rape which could imply several different emotions, happy sex should always imply that the participants are happy, so unless if I'm missing something, this implication should exist.