AIBooru

Rating update for rating:g and larger breasts

Posted under Tags

The bulk update request #243 has been rejected.

mass update rating:general large_breasts -> rating:sensitive
mass update rating:general huge_breasts -> rating:sensitive

Apparently a discussion was had between Talulah and another user that images featuring large breasts are rating:Sensitive.

While I don't believe that a post featuring a fully clothed character merely having a large chest can't be rating:general, I want to see what the general opinion is on this (while waiting for Fred/Lyren's input).

I believe that the size of the breasts should not be subject to a specific rating, since it only describes a quality of the character in the image and as long as the focus of the image is not the size of the character's breasts, it should be possible to use a rating g as in the posts: post #53372, post #53335, post #53231 None of these posts have anything suggestive, they simply describe the character in the image

ANJU said:

That's the point I'm trying to make. It makes no sense to automatically up a rating just because a character has large breasts if all the other criteria for an s rating isn't present.

If the idea is to have the above be how things are done then the 397 posts tagged rating:general ~large_breasts ~huge_breasts are technically all misrated and need to be moved to the appropriate rating.

Imagine it in a different scenario. Let's say you're a rather large breasted woman, walking into a place that is SFW. Are you then automatically called out for public indecency because your breasts are large?

Blob said:

Imagine it in a different scenario. Let's say you're a rather large breasted woman, walking into a place that is SFW. Are you then automatically called out for public indecency because your breasts are large?

I think you misunderstand my position on this.

I'm against the what this BUR is proposing and I'm mainly trying to understand what other people's opinions are on this because @Kawaxte said Talulah told them that large breasts are to be marked rating:Sensitive even if it would otherwise be a G post. I completely disagree with that idea though.

ANJU said:

I think you misunderstand my position on this.

I'm against the what this BUR is proposing and I'm mainly trying to understand what other people's opinions are on this because @Kawaxte said Talulah told them that large breasts are to be marked rating:Sensitive even if it would otherwise be a G post. I completely disagree with that idea though.

But that's what im saying, large breasts to me aren't an indicator of something being rating:sensitive

Blob said:

But that's what im saying, large breasts to me aren't an indicator of something being rating:sensitive

Oh. Well you were asking a question (that I'm sure you'd know my answer to assuming it wasn't rhetorical) and it gave me the impression my position wasn't clear enough.

ANJU said:

Oh. Well you were asking a question (that I'm sure you'd know my answer to assuming it wasn't rhetorical) and it gave me the impression my position wasn't clear enough.

But you understand my anecdote right? A woman isn't immediately more lewd by simply having larger breasts and no other additional factors.

Blob said:

Imagine it in a different scenario. Let's say you're a rather large breasted woman, walking into a place that is SFW. Are you then automatically called out for public indecency because your breasts are large?

Basically this. It's only Sensitive if the breasts are partially exposed (cleavage, underboob, sideboob) or skin tight to purposely making it lewd. Fully clothed girl in a normal scenario such as post #53291 is as rating:g to me as a flat chested girl.

That said, skin_tight ~large_breasts ~huge_breasts is not uncommon at all on anime illustrations (or AI gens for that matter) and is the reason why it is moved up to Sensitive a lot despite being fully clothed. But it's not always the case, and hence this BUR is no good.

1