AIBooru

Loli/shota check thread

Posted under Tags

Thank you for the thread. It might be a good idea as well to add examples of what is/is not loli/shota to their respective wikis since those posts are not hidden to the general public unlike on Danbooru.

Exactly 751 out of 1969 explicit posts of flandre_scarlet on Danbooru are tagged loli, so this seems like a good post to start a check with.
post #5615 - No breasts, no hips, and a char often seen as a loli. I'm leaning simply petite because of the longer torso and smaller head, thoughts?
post #5614 - Since I mentioned its sister post, I may as well list it as well, especially because it seems more clear cut to be what I presume is not loli.
post #2775 - Take away the explicit rating and mark as child or just nothing?

post #10491 & post #10485 - I can see the former as petite due to the body, but the latter is more questionable.

post #10287 - This one really make me uncomfortable, the face looks pre-adolescent. Maybe it is just the realism getting me. Is the consensus that it is petite?

post #8997 & post #8996 - Not loli right? Should probably have the petite tag added for both eventually still though.

post #6113 - The very large head to body ratio on a petite body, but there are breasts. More an unintentional result of early outputs.

post #6037 - Loli, toddlercon, or just overly rendered chibi? post #6034 hints the intention, but still...

post #5047, post #5051, post #5055 - all loli? post #5052 makes me realize that some characters clearly shift age drastically thanks to different outputs, something you don't really see in non AI art.

post #3760 - Petite?
post #3757 - Loli?

post #3503 - Clearly meant to be a 17 year old petite catgirl, but NAI spit out short limbs and a big head. I don't think its loli, but questionable enough for a second look I guess.

  • Reply
  • Baperb said:

    post #5615 - No breasts, no hips, and a char often seen as a loli. I'm leaning simply petite because of the longer torso and smaller head, thoughts?
    post #5614 - Since I mentioned its sister post, I may as well list it as well, especially because it seems more clear cut to be what I presume is not loli.
    post #2775 - Take away the explicit rating and mark as child or just nothing?

    post #10491 & post #10485 - I can see the former as petite due to the body, but the latter is more questionable.

    post #10287 - This one really make me uncomfortable, the face looks pre-adolescent. Maybe it is just the realism getting me. Is the consensus that it is petite?

    post #8997 & post #8996 - Not loli right? Should probably have the petite tag added for both eventually still though.

    post #6113 - The very large head to body ratio on a petite body, but there are breasts. More an unintentional result of early outputs.

    post #6037 - Loli, toddlercon, or just overly rendered chibi? post #6034 hints the intention, but still...

    post #5047, post #5051, post #5055 - all loli? post #5052 makes me realize that some characters clearly shift age drastically thanks to different outputs, something you don't really see in non AI art.

    post #3760 - Petite?
    post #3757 - Loli?

    post #3503 - Clearly meant to be a 17 year old petite catgirl, but NAI spit out short limbs and a big head. I don't think its loli, but questionable enough for a second look I guess.

    My own thoughts on each post:
    post #5615 post #5614 longer torso is a good point but I am still learning towards loli for both.
    post #2775 it doesn't always have to be Q/E for loli, so rating:s loli would be my tagging for this one.
    post #10491 no not loli at all, just petite - post #10485 Longer body than with the Scarlet pics mentioned above as well as thick thighs so I would say petite.
    post #10287 as mentioned in DMs own opinion is petite and not loli due to body shape.
    post #8996 no, post #8997 is inching closer to loli but I would say no. Petite for both.
    post #6113 Just petite in my opinion. Very tall girl.
    post #6037 never tagged toddlercon but I am leaning towards it with this post.
    post #5047 post #5055 yes, and for post #5051 most likely oppai loli tag as well.
    post #3760 leaning towards loli I'd say
    post #3757 yes loli
    post #3503 I would say loli for this one too.

  • Reply
  • antlers_anon said:

    Need help with post #12655 not a loli but looks rather young? Is this petite? I checked the wiki and other posts tagged with the tag but I don't really understand what should be tagged, sorry.

    Given the fact that this image is upper body and we don't even see the legs - breasts, shoulders and arms are the indicators here which tag to use and based on those body parts I would not give this image petite either.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • Hey, it's me again. With loli problems again. I checked the search results for realistic loli and the only results that are not banned (btw why are the banned ones marked as "Active Banned" and not just "Banned"?) are my uploads. I don't consider them lolis and that's why I uploaded them in the first place but if we're calling them lolis shouldn't they get removed too? I don't mind removing them at all, in fact I don't like being the sole exception to the no realistic loli rule.

    Of course I'd prefer if we dropped the rule and only left it at forbidding photorealistic loli/shotas but if that's not possible, my question is if post #13182, post #10413, post #9832, post #9809, post #8609 and post #6222 really are realistic lolis. If someone can confirm, then I'll remove them right away and upload something else instead.

  • Reply
  • antlers_anon said:

    (btw why are the banned ones marked as "Active Banned" and not just "Banned"?)

    The Banned flag is in addition to other status flags. Active Banned just means it's both active (approved) and banned. It could also be Deleted Banned, Pending Banned, Appealed Banned.

  • Reply
  • redjoe23 said:

    post #13463

    The whole set is realistic loli, right?

    I wouldn't call that realistic, even squinting from a distance it looks very stylized. As far as loli goes, post #13467 looks like it could perhaps match AIBooru's definition of loli, maybe post #13468 too, but the rest are probably just petite. Considering the prompt contains toddler though, I would certainly say they were trying. Always interesting to read some prompts here.

  • Reply
  • amagaeru said:

    Sorry.
    Did I violate the posting rules?
    I was careless in thinking it was not "photorealistic".

    I'd say you're safe. The only thing discussed here is whether it should be tagged as loli or not. Lolis are allowed as long as they're not realistic and wouldn't say yours is.

  • Reply
  • Lyren said:

    loli or female_child or neither? post #23065 - it's S due to a lot of skin but it's not exactly lewd either.

    I think it should be female_child and that would need to automatically give it the tag child(dont know of it does) also i dont think it has brown_background but that's up to you

  • Reply
  • 1