Please tell me you haven't been tagging breasts like these as small.
Nope, most of what I've been tagging has been clearly on the other end of the scale, where it's a bit more... blatant? where the dividing lines are; hence why I'm trying to track down reference images.
This is one of the few images I've come across that is:
ai generated - lots of these
has precisely two girls - lots of these too
girl1 and girl2 have different-sized chesticles - a relatively niche subject, at least as I've found so far.
is an image I'd be willing to show my mum - doesn't filter out as many images as I've feared, but the number of such images with smaller chesticles is somewhat startling.
Nope, most of what I've been tagging has been clearly on the other end of the scale, where it's a bit more... blatant? where the dividing lines are; hence why I'm trying to track down reference images.
This is one of the few images I've come across that is:
ai generated - lots of these
has precisely two girls - lots of these too
girl1 and girl2 have different-sized chesticles - a relatively niche subject, at least as I've found so far.
is an image I'd be willing to show my mum - doesn't filter out as many images as I've feared, but the number of such images with smaller chesticles is somewhat startling.
has metadata available
The problem is that these are large and medium, not medium and small (and even then, the medium ones are stretching it).
Nur said:
Well, for a normal human perspective, these would be fairly big, but considering the stuff I like this would be small. c:
That's not how tags work, I hope you realize that.
I think no cleavage as the breasts aren't being pressed together enough, or at least I can't say they are without a different angle, and also no sideboob as the outside of the nearest breast is covered right up to the breast root.
