Is it necessary to distinguish between faux retro artstyle and retro artstyle? It's unlikely that any real retro artstyle will be posted on AIbooru.
Gigi_sfw said:
No i think,because faux retro artstyle is used for modern arts with old art styles and retro artstyle is used for both old arts and new arts Sorry if i'm wrong
Unfortunately, it's Lost Media; I can't find their art anymore :(, their account was deleted
Part of their generations has been preserved in the "All Uploads" section (https://aibooru.online/media_assets) โ assets from #634765 down to #634570 (around page 35 at the time of writing). I think I also spotted a few more further back.
Some images still retain their metadata as well (for example, asset #634745), so the style itself isn't lost. If you have access to NAI, you can use the metadata to recreate the image and continue generating in that style. I actually saw the same style being used by someone else a few days ago, most likely a different person using the same prompt.
Also, in asset #634601, the censorship appears to have been applied incorrectly. And as far as I know, Pixiv may interpret posting large numbers of images every day as spam, which tends to attract moderator attention more quickly.
Unfortunately, it's Lost Media; I can't find their art anymore :(, their account was deleted
Ah well that is sad, not unexpected from Pixiv though site has horrible preservation. I would have a look at other sites that scrape images but it's a bit late for me, I'm sure they'll be around somewhere. Maybe a reverse image search on an image we have might bring up somewhere with the others.
konny said:
Part of their generations has been preserved in the "All Uploads" section (https://aibooru.online/media_assets) โ assets from #634765 down to #634570 (around page 35 at the time of writing). I think I also spotted a few more further back.
Some images still retain their metadata as well (for example, asset #634745), so the style itself isn't lost. If you have access to NAI, you can use the metadata to recreate the image and continue generating in that style. I actually saw the same style being used by someone else a few days ago, most likely a different person using the same prompt.
Also, in asset #634601, the censorship appears to have been applied incorrectly. And as far as I know, Pixiv may interpret posting large numbers of images every day as spam, which tends to attract moderator attention more quickly.
The model you use for this image, is it a good one to use for multiple loli images? Sorry for the odd question, been trying to find a loli Ai image generator to use myself, but not sure how to go about finding one.
The model you use for this image, is it a good one to use for multiple loli images? Sorry for the odd question, been trying to find a loli Ai image generator to use myself, but not sure how to go about finding one.
No problem, though I can't say I'm an expert on this myself.
I think all modern models (Illustrious, NoobAI, NovelAI, anima, and their derivatives) can generate loli without any issues, especially with LoRAs. Use โloli has:metadataโ in the search, and youโll quickly find all the images that include metadata for the generation and the model used - that should give you a useful point of comparison. One thing to note is that NovelAI is a paid online service, while anima generally benefits from having a powerful GPU. Illustrious and NoobAI (both SDXL-based models), on the other hand, will run on pretty much anything.
If you're just getting started with image generation, wai-illustrious-sdxl is a pretty good starting point for almost anything.
HI ! I love this style so much. Im little ai artist too. Whats IA do you use for make this art ?
Judging by the model tag they used NovelAI, also if you look under the image you will also see a tab called "AI Metadata" where you can see how it was generated.