AIBooru

Comments

Blacklisted:
[hidden]

Might not be to my tastes but i dont understand why people are downvoting as it IS ai art, however niche and not "nice" it may be to some. It is a little disturbing to some so i'd probably label future posts like this with the guro tag (i believe it classifies) so it can be filtered by default for those who don't want to see that.

Dont let it discourage you though.

Edit: It looks like the wiki description for what qualifies as guro is different on here than on Gelbooru where its more broad. Gelbooru excerpt:

Extreme graphic violence is part of it but things like horrifying monsters and body horror are also guro. Basically anything that is simultaneously erotic and grotesque qualifies as guro."

Gelbooru Wiki source

Would love a staff take on this as i feel like it does belong but might not be welcomed by everybody

Updated

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    RC0N said:

    Might not be to my tastes but i dont understand why people are downvoting as it IS ai art, however niche and not "nice" it may be to some. It is a little disturbing to some so i'd probably label future posts like this with the guro tag (i believe it classifies) so it can be filtered by default for those who don't want to see that.

    Dont let it discourage you though.

    Edit: It looks like the wiki description for what qualifies as guro is different on here than on Gelbooru where its more broad. Gelbooru excerpt:

    Gelbooru Wiki source

    Would love a staff take on this as i feel like it does belong but might not be welcomed by everybody

    People are downvoting it presumably because they don't like it. Score is a metric of popularity, not whether or not it breaks the rules. Whether or not it ends up approved comes down to if an approver likes it enough, as it doesn't seem to break the rules.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Talulah said:

    People are downvoting it presumably because they don't like it. Score is a metric of popularity, not whether or not it breaks the rules. Whether or not it ends up approved comes down to if an approver likes it enough, as it doesn't seem to break the rules.

    That makes sense, I was thinking about votes in a different way. Probably because all the posts with negative votes have been deleted pretty quickly, (usually because they actually were breaking the rules). So i guess i just made a mental connection without questioning it much.

    In any case, does something like this qualify as guro in your mind? Personally don't really want to see it if I don't have to, though I can appreciate that others might like it. Monster Girl is a bit broad because anything with even a slight amount of "monster" to it applies, like a slime girl or harpy etc so you can't really set up filtering based on that.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    RC0N said:

    That makes sense, I was thinking about votes in a different way. Probably because all the posts with negative votes have been deleted pretty quickly, (usually because they actually were breaking the rules). So i guess i just made a mental connection without questioning it much.

    In any case, does something like this qualify as guro in your mind? Personally don't really want to see it if I don't have to, though I can appreciate that others might like it. Monster Girl is a bit broad because anything with even a slight amount of "monster" to it applies, like a slime girl or harpy etc so you can't really set up filtering based on that.

    I usually only think of guro as extreme violence, but I know others (including pixiv) have differing definitions.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    NotYourDoorknob said:

    The AI's struggle with symmetry actually works in its favour when making future streetwear style clothes.

    Yeah, kinda funny how that works. Also not bad at doing military clothing because of the badges lol.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Model is:
    Save as float16 but only at the last step (for same results, float32 gives sometimes dissimilar results)
    [Add Difference] Stable Diffusion 1.5 + (Anything 3.0 - Stable Diffusion 1.4) [M=1] -> mergeStep1
    [Add Difference] mergeStep1 + (Zeipher_F222 - Stable Diffusion 1.5) [M=1] -> mergeStep2
    [Weighted Sum] mergeStep2 + TrinArt2 [M=0.25] -> Final Model

    Updated

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    The model you have is really good, i tried to make it for myself using the instructions in the model name but i don't get the same hash, it does produce similar results though. Was wondering if you can give some more info on it ๐Ÿค”

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    RC0N said:

    The model you have is really good, i tried to make it for myself using the instructions in the model name but i don't get the same hash, it does produce similar results though. Was wondering if you can give some more info on it ๐Ÿค”

    Maybe I did mess up somewhere, since you're not the first person getting a different hash. If you want, some anons in the thread wanted it, so it's on mega here:
    `file/nZtz0LZL#ExSHp7icsZedxOH_yRUOKAliPGfKRsWiOYHqULZy9Yo`

  • 3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    antlers_anon said:

    Maybe I did mess up somewhere, since you're not the first person getting a different hash. If you want, some anons in the thread wanted it, so it's on mega here:
    `file/nZtz0LZL#ExSHp7icsZedxOH_yRUOKAliPGfKRsWiOYHqULZy9Yo`

    Legend. Thanks :).

    Iduno if saving it as float16 changes the hash, but probably? So that may be what it is. I Assume thats why its only 2GB vs most of my other models which are 3.9

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    redditiscreepy said:

    @relampagomarquinhos Do you have the recipe for this model? Hash 2e41a25c?

    It's Berry's mix with F222 instead of F111
    Edit: At least i guess so, same models included.
    Edit 2: Just tested it to be sure, seems i am correct: Result "BerryMix14.ckpt [2e41a25c]". Worth it to note that F222 is actually based on SD 1.5, so subtracting that in the "NAI + (F111 - SD1.4)" step instead of SD 1.4 would probably lead to better (but different) results.

    Updated

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    RC0N said:

    It's Berry's mix with F222 instead of F111
    Edit: At least i guess so, same models included.
    Edit 2: Just tested it to be sure, seems i am correct: Result "BerryMix14.ckpt [2e41a25c]". Worth it to note that F222 is actually based on SD 1.5, so subtracting that in the "NAI + (F111 - SD1.4)" step instead of SD 1.4 would probably lead to better (but different) results.

    This. I think there was a point where I fucked up and made one of the steps with the clipskip 2. Don't know if it makes any difference, but since it works fine, I didn't bothered to fix.

    That's it - Just a Berrymix with SD 1.4 and F222. Follow the steps normally, just change the F111 for the F222.

  • 1
  • Reply