I'll probably get downvoted for saying this, but I do have a fanbox where people do support me. I'm sure there are some links to it even on this site and yet I don't really feel like a scumbag T_T Calling out aggressive advertisement like in this post is fine. I don't like ads too, but it's technically not against the rules as far as I know. (I agree we could add large watermarks to the prohibited content list.)
... I don't like ads too, but it's technically not against the rules as far as I know. (I agree we could add large watermarks to the prohibited content list.)
It's not against the rules, but I'd agree it probably should be.
Posts like the two from this user so far just seem like advertisements for their patreon and people don't come here to look at stuff that only serves to promote something like that.
I suspect that you have mistagged the model you used on this one
I was about to say that you should be able to check the metadata to see the tags used for making it but it seems I forgot to give the tags for the non-ai scaled version, because I'm certain I had no extra hands but oh well.
Okay I just checked and I did tag no extra hands but didn't emphasize it so maybe that's why
I was about to say that you should be able to check the metadata to see the tags used for making it but it seems I forgot to give the tags for the non-ai scaled version, because I'm certain I had no extra hands but oh well.
Okay I just checked and I did tag no extra hands but didn't emphasize it so maybe that's why
I meant the model. You tagged this one as anydream when I'm fairly certain you meant to tag anything
I meant the model. You tagged this one as anydream when I'm fairly certain you meant to tag anything
Jesus, I didn't even catch that. Indeed, I did mean anything, because this image (most of it) was made in the same batch as the others I uploaded a few days ago! Thanks for pointing that out
oh come on, the floating plates may be unrealistic, but at least they are well made, no anatomy errors or anything like that. I could say that a girl flying is unreal and that alone is also a bad image, come on, that's stupid.
if it is well done, without serious anatomical errors, it deserves a second chance.
oh come on, the floating plates may be unrealistic, but at least they are well made, no anatomy errors or anything like that. I could say that a girl flying is unreal and that alone is also a bad image, come on, that's stupid.
if it is well done, without serious anatomical errors, it deserves a second chance.
There's a difference between disinterest & poor quality.
