AIBooru

Comments

Blacklisted:
[hidden]

antlers_anon said:

@zakiry It was a test version of antlersmix_11. I must have forgot to tag it, fixed now. I didn't end up liking this mix so I didn't post it anywhere, but here most of the style comes from the loras (mainly dreamwave - it's on civitai) so any semi-realistic model should look similar I think.

You still remember how you created antlersmix_11?

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    antlers_anon said:

    @zakiry It was a test version of antlersmix_11. I must have forgot to tag it, fixed now. I didn't end up liking this mix so I didn't post it anywhere, but here most of the style comes from the loras (mainly dreamwave - it's on civitai) so any semi-realistic model should look similar I think.

    <3

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    @zakiry It was a test version of antlersmix_11. I must have forgot to tag it, fixed now. I didn't end up liking this mix so I didn't post it anywhere, but here most of the style comes from the loras (mainly dreamwave - it's on civitai) so any semi-realistic model should look similar I think.

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Anonymous407 said:

    I may as well ask because I’m interested, but are these softwares free to use?

    To begin with, these are not software.
    Simply put, LoRAs are models plus additional training data that you can create yourself and use to generate images.
    This image is generated using several LoRAs created by others.
    So, I have listed the LoRAs I used to generate this image in the previous comment.
    The website civitai, which I often use to find LoRAs, allows you to download these for free.

  • 3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Ocean3 said:

    good hand 👌

    Only the pinky finger was inpainted as it was bent too much to the right but no manual edits at all! (The only manual edit in this whole pic was removing the background)

    Your models are just something else, gotta love 'em.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Left eye look weird, but it looks a bit like ahegao so it's fine I think.

    On another note, @木呗雲鸟 if you've generated the images yourself, it'd be great if you could tag them as self_upload and you can add an artist tag for yourself. Links to loras could be placed in the commentary too (thanks for sharing the links btw, I wish more people did it for the less known loras).

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    AsanaJM said:

    sometime i don't understand downvotes lol

    Bottom of the horns are messed up as if there's extra piece of skin, and the teeth are inconsistent as well. I am generally not a fan of these animated ones since I've barely seen any that actually look good to my eye. It's all up to a preference of course, but hopefully you understand at least some of the downvotes now.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    antlers_anon said:

    • people who didn't read the book: Frankenstein is the monster
    • people who read the book: Frankenstein is the one who created the monster
    • people who understood the book: Frankenstein is the monster
    • but they were all wrong, because the real monster is the creator of this image

    No.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]
    • people who didn't read the book: Frankenstein is the monster
    • people who read the book: Frankenstein is the one who created the monster
    • people who understood the book: Frankenstein is the monster
    • but they were all wrong, because the real monster is the creator of this image
  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    azreturned said:

    Incredible preservation of detail between frames... It's unlike any AI animation I've ever seen. Honestly I would love to know more about the workflow to achieve such stunning movements... The bodies, the water, the steam, the clothes, and the shading are so insanely consistent compared to older animations. I'm dying to know more about how this was done.

    This guy drumicube (https://civitai.com/user/drumicube/images) actually has a few more of these.

  • 3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Incredible preservation of detail between frames... It's unlike any AI animation I've ever seen. Honestly I would love to know more about the workflow to achieve such stunning movements... The bodies, the water, the steam, the clothes, and the shading are so insanely consistent compared to older animations. I'm dying to know more about how this was done.

  • 5
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Timmek said:

    what is a model? I could not

    Pre-trained Stable Diffusion weights, also known as checkpoint files, are models designed for generating images of a general or specific genre. What images a model can generate depends on the data used to train them.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    barcode,
    Negative prompt: (worst quality, low quality:1.4),skindentation, nipples,
    Steps: 20, Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 1865090892, Size: 512x768, Model hash: ef0cb5e9b6, Denoising strength: 0.55, Hires upscale: 1.7, Hires steps: 20, Hires upscaler: Latent

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    AsanaJM said:

    some Anon on 4chan saw that i f***ed up one nipple, here is a v2 q_q
    https://zupimages.net/up/23/42/499m.jpeg
    it's annoying we can't edit upload sometime lol

    thx Nur tho

    Hi, IMO, the nipple looks fine, it just looks like an inverted nipple, which only about 10-20% of people have inverted nipples, which makes them rather rare to see, but I do like this new edit the areola looks better and the nipple looks ready to pop out.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    antlers_anon said:

    Your little Aina is going places! You should be happy!

    Maybe they're not a fan of explicit content featuring their characters, idk.
    I've always felt the same way about mine, but I'd take any art I get regardless (I guess)

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    DrFisura said:

    I learned to use a VAE like a fucking human being, sir

    Great, this brings me back memories when I used to generate bland images with dead colors, I felt really dumb back then. Keep it up!

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    So there was a comment originally or was it later added? I thought it was more the eyes being slightly different and remnants of the orange lines. Sigh, well, the vagina's been reworked multiple times, so I guess I still wasn't able to perfect it enough

    "The whole image looks smudged" is something I don't really agree with, it's a stylistic effect with blues and yellows being lighting/shading but I'll try to learn from my mistakes

  • 1
  • Reply
  • 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12