AIBooru

Comments

Blacklisted:
[hidden]

Kaede_Ono said:

This was flagged for apparently missing a finger, I assume on the left hand (to the right of the image).. but I feel like the thumb may just be hidden considering this is a common position the left hand is drawn in when it's up like that.

No, the hand to our left (her right hand) only has 4 fingers

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    This was flagged for apparently missing a finger, I assume on the left hand (to the right of the image).. but I feel like the thumb may just be hidden considering this is a common position the left hand is drawn in when it's up like that.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Evakuator said:

    I didn't find the function of requesting a moderator for a replacement.
    So I uploaded this file in corrected version (removed the extra finger at the microphone) on deviantart.
    https://www.deviantart.com/evakuator/art/Welcome-to-the-show-1011690758

    Can you replace the current wrong file with the correct one, or do I need to upload it to some separate repository?

    Hi, I replaced your post with the DA link you provided, since it's a minor fix.
    If you need future replacements, you can use topic #172.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Kaede_Ono said:

    It will be auto deleted if not approved in 3 days, but since it would need a minor fix.. if you make a revised version, you can request this to be replaced.

    I didn't find the function of requesting a moderator for a replacement.
    So I uploaded this file in corrected version (removed the extra finger at the microphone) on deviantart.
    https://www.deviantart.com/evakuator/art/Welcome-to-the-show-1011690758

    Can you replace the current wrong file with the correct one, or do I need to upload it to some separate repository?

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Evakuator said:

    Mother of god, I didn't notice the extra finger and didn't finalize it. How do I delete what I downloaded?

    It will be auto deleted if not approved in 3 days, but since it would need a minor fix.. if you make a revised version, you can request this to be replaced.

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    I generally try stay away from policing comments too hard, but can we be a little more constructive than just calling their uploads awful? A helpful comment goes a long way and I'd rather they not be discouraged because their uploads aren't generally liked here.

    If you really dislike the post, then downvote and move on. I'm getting kind of tired of seeing mean and sarcastic comments that don't help anything (not only on this post, but on others).

    Updated

  • 4
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Hey guys, did you know that in terms of male human and female Pokรฉmon breeding, Vaporeon is the most compatible Pokรฉmon for humans? Not only are they in the field egg group, which is mostly comprised of mammals, Vaporeon are an average of 3โ€03โ€™ tall and 63.9 pounds, this means theyโ€™re large enough to be able handle human dicks, and with their impressive Base Stats for HP and access to Acid Armor, you can be rough with one. Due to their mostly water based biology, thereโ€™s no doubt in my mind that an aroused Vaporeon would be incredibly wet, so wet that you could easily have sex with one for hours without getting sore. They can also learn the moves Attract, Baby-Doll Eyes, Captivate, Charm, and Tail Whip, along with not having fur to hide nipples, so itโ€™d be incredibly easy for one to get you in the mood. With their abilities Water Absorb and Hydration, they can easily recover from fatigue with enough water. No other Pokรฉmon comes close to this level of compatibility. Also, fun fact, if you pull out enough, you can make your Vaporeon turn white. Vaporeon is literally built for human dick. Ungodly defense stat+high HP pool+Acid Armor means it can take cock all day, all shapes and sizes and still come for more

  • 3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    MenacingDude said:

    this metadata feels so devious

    But specifically, for the "quadriplegic" tag, I really wanted to get her legs to be near the chair legs and not in some other pose. There is just not a lot of good data of women sitting in wheel chairs.

    The intent of trying to get this to work is to have some bondage out in public locations, but it is difficult to force it.

    As an interesting note, quadriplegic led to a significant increase in how often the image ended up being in black and white or just very low contrast. The word embeddings for it have a ton of connotations with it and no representation within Booru tags, so I stopped using the tag.

    Updated

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    sulph said:

    Your prompt is ass

    This is from a giant script that uses sd-dynamic-prompts in Automatic1111 to generate different scenarios. So there's different professions, hair styles, bondage situations, etc.

    If I am going for a specific scenario, it is easy to clean up to get something readable.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    @abi_00
    Sorry, I missed your comment earlier. Could be a number of things really. I tried the same settings on v12 of realcartoon and it was very similar so it's unlikely that. Maybe it's clip skip or missing embeddings (BadDream is the most important one for the style I think)? Could also be that some of the loras I'm using have new versions and they look different. I think I didn't do anything weird during upscaling so that's not a problem, but maybe you're starting with a different resolution and that makes the faces different. You could always send me the image you're getting, here or on discord and we can troubleshoot from there.

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Jemnite said:

    If you're fast enough on the upload (i.e. before the thread gets pushed off the board), the commentary will autofill. Otherwise it'll get autotagged with bad source.

    Ahh, okay. Good to know. Cheers for adding source for some. I've added for the rest. Is it standard to add source with the original 4chan.org link or archive links for dead threads? Or does it not matter?

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    anon79827394879872 said:

    Nope. These aren't mine. That's where I got them though and the thread OP is the artist.

    If you're fast enough on the upload (i.e. before the thread gets pushed off the board), the commentary will autofill. Otherwise it'll get autotagged with bad source.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    This is one of the best pieces I've see here. I've been trying to replicate this style of face to no avail. I've used the same model version, the newer one, and a combo of the loras indicated below. Any tips?

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    rkkrn said:

    The software I use for image generation is Stable Diffusion WebUI. I am running this in a Colab Pro environment.
    If you use Colab Pro as I do, I recommend using the notebook at https://github.com/TheLastBen/fast-stable-diffusion.
    The model used to generate this image is feathermix. It can be downloaded from the link in the wiki of this tag.
    I have merged some LoRA into this model and used it.

    Thanks I'll download them and see how it goes

  • 3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    satanael said:

    Can you tell me what ai software you ise as i want to try to make some ai art similar to what you post here and it would be very usefull to have some data to work off of as a start.

    The software I use for image generation is Stable Diffusion WebUI. I am running this in a Colab Pro environment.
    If you use Colab Pro as I do, I recommend using the notebook at https://github.com/TheLastBen/fast-stable-diffusion.
    The model used to generate this image is feathermix. It can be downloaded from the link in the wiki of this tag.
    I have merged some LoRA into this model and used it.

  • 3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    ANJU said:

    I don't know if the downvotes/disapprovals were due to the image quality itself or something about its content.

    I've never really been a huge fan of posts featuring outright sex but I've been loosening up on that and trying not to be too dismissive. Another thing I don't really like is excessive/large amounts of cum (if not for that I probably would've approved) but I don't have a specific quality related reason because the image itself looks fine.

    Fair enough, I'll reduce the amount of cum.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    jurassicparklionkingfan said:

    It appears, people do not like this post (getting downvoted a lot). Can I get constructive feedback as to why? So I can improve my AI quality in the future. I'm still pretty new to AI and working on improving my generations. My goal is also understand what exactly this booru is looking for in terms of quality, content type, etc.

    I don't know if the downvotes/disapprovals were due to the image quality itself or something about its content.

    I've never really been a huge fan of posts featuring outright sex but I've been loosening up on that and trying not to be too dismissive. Another thing I don't really like is excessive/large amounts of cum (if not for that I probably would've approved) but I don't have a specific quality related reason because the image itself looks fine.

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    It appears, people do not like this post (getting downvoted a lot). Can I get constructive feedback as to why? So I can improve my AI quality in the future. I'm still pretty new to AI and working on improving my generations. My goal is also understand what exactly this booru is looking for in terms of quality, content type, etc.

  • 2
  • Reply
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9