Also, if you post a list of links like this you can use [expand="TITLE"][/expand] to put it in a collapsible element, so it doesn't take a huge amount of space. Not a warning, just a friendly suggestion.
Also, if you post a list of links like this you can use [expand="TITLE"][/expand] to put it in a collapsible element, so it doesn't take a huge amount of space. Not a warning, just a friendly suggestion.
On top of that, if Fred really had a problem with it, he'd complain and probably change something... which he hasn't and I damn well know he would if it really bothered him because he's the specific reason the max file size for uploads got cut to 50MB from 100MB.
The real issue with having a lot of unposted uploads for any particular user is only if it's obvious someone is trying to use the site as their personal image host; uploading a ton of random crap that isn't AIBooru's focus. Media assets generally don't get deleted unless it's rule-breaking content, illegal content, or if it's off-topic (which is still rule-breaking, but oh well).
Not sure how much disk space fred has but is it necessary to post so many media assets without posting them? We can just click the pixiv link and see the rest :P
Whenever you upload a Pixiv link, all the pictures within the post will be auto uploaded to the site anyway. It will take up disk space whether or not I link them in the comment. This is just me being OCD af in case the artist deletes/privates their works or got banned. As it happens quite often on Pixiv.
Not sure how much disk space fred has but is it necessary to post so many media assets without posting them? We can just click the pixiv link and see the rest :P
All image uploads I do on this account are original image generations (OC Character). It's been a while since I last uploaded anything, so I kinda forgot about the rules and was too lazy to recheck. I'm very sorry. I'll do better in the future. Thank you!
i meant that i was tagging like "1girl, 1boy, fingering" etc. etc. and it rejected all my tags because i formatted like that with commas and spaces instead of "1girl 1boy fingering_from_behind"
Sorry - new to this. And was frustrated to do it over again right then. Thankyou to whoever ended up tagging for me.
I think no cleavage as the breasts aren't being pressed together enough, or at least I can't say they are without a different angle, and also no sideboob as the outside of the nearest breast is covered right up to the breast root.
Nope, most of what I've been tagging has been clearly on the other end of the scale, where it's a bit more... blatant? where the dividing lines are; hence why I'm trying to track down reference images.
This is one of the few images I've come across that is:
ai generated - lots of these
has precisely two girls - lots of these too
girl1 and girl2 have different-sized chesticles - a relatively niche subject, at least as I've found so far.
is an image I'd be willing to show my mum - doesn't filter out as many images as I've feared, but the number of such images with smaller chesticles is somewhat startling.
has metadata available
The problem is that these are large and medium, not medium and small (and even then, the medium ones are stretching it).
Nur said:
Well, for a normal human perspective, these would be fairly big, but considering the stuff I like this would be small. c:
That's not how tags work, I hope you realize that.
Please tell me you haven't been tagging breasts like these as small.
Nope, most of what I've been tagging has been clearly on the other end of the scale, where it's a bit more... blatant? where the dividing lines are; hence why I'm trying to track down reference images.
This is one of the few images I've come across that is:
ai generated - lots of these
has precisely two girls - lots of these too
girl1 and girl2 have different-sized chesticles - a relatively niche subject, at least as I've found so far.
is an image I'd be willing to show my mum - doesn't filter out as many images as I've feared, but the number of such images with smaller chesticles is somewhat startling.
I'm afraid, prompt won't help you much, as this picture was created using controlnet (using my own sketch) and inpaint.
score_9_up, score_8_up, score_7_up, (artist:sciamano240:1.1), (artist:kittew:0.75), (artist:ilya_kuvshinov:0.8), line art, sketch, year 2023, deep eyes, perfect face, detailed face, aesthetic, sketch style, thick outline, traditional media, white background, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, very pleasing
wow! incredible. Are you using a specific lora to achieve that result with that style?, I truly love the quality it has
@Blackfiretsuna Just the lora 'Toy Camera' at low strength and some of the artist tags used on other images using this model. A long prompt with some quality tags and unique stuff like 'infra-red glow' etc. I suppose.
Thanks Pooch! I'm not sure I agree with the "always" part but I'm glad you like it. btw this is probably one of my favorite images from what I've generated so far, but I'm not really surprised people don't like it as much as when I post loli butts
Your images are always such a nice quality, always interesting and always come with full metadata. They might not be to everyone 's liking because of their content but who cares. Thank you for posting them.
Everything is perfect here. The stockings are simply top-notch, the plump thighs are an excellent size, the hairy pussy looks great, the tummy could be made a little thicker, but it also looks great, and I think the fluff on the armpits is missing. Excellent art thank you!!))
