Very neat. I'll have to try a bunch of these on various models. The stuff getting generated on Yiffy-e18 is often very samey since it seems like half the prompts anyone uses invoke Pino Daeni, and I'm guilty of relying on him too much myself in that model.
I went through and made my picks from the different tabs on that. Of course, all the examples included with that are generated from just SD1.5, and doesnt really show fully how it would impact a more specialized model (such as NovelAI). That's why i made this.
Thanks. All this stuff is so new. Learning the basics is a lot, and now there's extensions on top of it... Overwhelming in a fun way.
I went through and made my picks from the different tabs on that. Of course, all the examples included with that are generated from just SD1.5, and doesnt really show fully how it would impact a more specialized model (such as NovelAI). That's why i made this.
I could stuff any number of general tags in the tag list but it seems pointless given how many images there are. Also, looks like i popped the "Incredibly_Absurdres" cherry!
Maybe I did mess up somewhere, since you're not the first person getting a different hash. If you want, some anons in the thread wanted it, so it's on mega here: `file/nZtz0LZL#ExSHp7icsZedxOH_yRUOKAliPGfKRsWiOYHqULZy9Yo`
Legend. Thanks :).
Iduno if saving it as float16 changes the hash, but probably? So that may be what it is. I Assume thats why its only 2GB vs most of my other models which are 3.9
The model you have is really good, i tried to make it for myself using the instructions in the model name but i don't get the same hash, it does produce similar results though. Was wondering if you can give some more info on it ๐ค
Maybe I did mess up somewhere, since you're not the first person getting a different hash. If you want, some anons in the thread wanted it, so it's on mega here: `file/nZtz0LZL#ExSHp7icsZedxOH_yRUOKAliPGfKRsWiOYHqULZy9Yo`
The model you have is really good, i tried to make it for myself using the instructions in the model name but i don't get the same hash, it does produce similar results though. Was wondering if you can give some more info on it ๐ค
I seem to be getting a slightly different hash, despite going float16. I also get totally different unrelated results... I suspect something is up with my A1111 or something. Thank you for your help though anyway!~
Weird, is your webui updated? Do you get a completely different style or mangled results? More realistic or flat textures? Or is it just different poses but same style?
Thanks! Nice to hear you like it. What I did is basically an updated berrymix with r_34 replaced by trinart, here's a recipe: 1. novelai * 0.95 + sd-1.5 * 0.05 (weighted sum) 2. set method to "add difference" - model A: mix_from_step_1 - model B: f222 - model C: sd-1.5 - multiplier M: 1 3. mix_from_step_2 * 0.8 + trinart2 * 0.2 (weighted sum)
I also used float16 if you want to get the exact same hash.
I seem to be getting a slightly different hash, despite going float16. I also get totally different unrelated results... I suspect something is up with my A1111 or something. Thank you for your help though anyway!~
Thanks! Nice to hear you like it. What I did is basically an updated berrymix with r_34 replaced by trinart, here's a recipe: 1. novelai * 0.95 + sd-1.5 * 0.05 (weighted sum) 2. set method to "add difference" - model A: mix_from_step_1 - model B: f222 - model C: sd-1.5 - multiplier M: 1 3. mix_from_step_2 * 0.8 + trinart2 * 0.2 (weighted sum)
I also used float16 if you want to get the exact same hash.
It's Berry's mix with F222 instead of F111 Edit: At least i guess so, same models included. Edit 2: Just tested it to be sure, seems i am correct: Result "BerryMix14.ckpt [2e41a25c]". Worth it to note that F222 is actually based on SD 1.5, so subtracting that in the "NAI + (F111 - SD1.4)" step instead of SD 1.4 would probably lead to better (but different) results.
This. I think there was a point where I fucked up and made one of the steps with the clipskip 2. Don't know if it makes any difference, but since it works fine, I didn't bothered to fix.
That's it - Just a Berrymix with SD 1.4 and F222. Follow the steps normally, just change the F111 for the F222.
It's Berry's mix with F222 instead of F111 Edit: At least i guess so, same models included. Edit 2: Just tested it to be sure, seems i am correct: Result "BerryMix14.ckpt [2e41a25c]". Worth it to note that F222 is actually based on SD 1.5, so subtracting that in the "NAI + (F111 - SD1.4)" step instead of SD 1.4 would probably lead to better (but different) results.
I added more tags but not sure what to do for the numbers written on her butt cheek; I tagged it as 'body_writing' for now, though it could be 'tally_marks' if we want it more specific?
where and how is this Ai, if it is. bro teach me. I do not think this is AI
It's using Berry's Mix. Just match the prompts and see it appear before your very eyes. I think I did some inpainting to change something (can't remember), but follow online guides and use the prompt and you'll get something nearly identical.
It's funny that I put 2girls in the prompt, but it made 1 girl and a small portion of what I'm suspecting to be a guy. Still... having more or less people than desired seems to be very common.
Huh. My guess would be that it has something to do with how image samples are loaded. Maybe certain colors appear differently when scaled down, but when shown in original resolution, it just appears normally or something.
Too much fun and wasted GPU resources for this thing. Decided to take on more challenging pose and concept. Same generation method as post #6321
masterpiece, best quality, (official art: 1.2), (mermaid with dark blue tail: 2), (lamia with light pink snake tail: 2), asymmetrical irises, 2girl, (loli: 2.3), (visible stomach: 1.2), looking at viewer, long hair, hair bow, tearing up, (wet clothes: 1.5), long tops, long sleeves, cheerleader skirt, (sportswear: 1.4), worries,๐ฅน, blush, tired, (sitting on floor: 1.3), (locker room: 1.4), wooden floor, sun light, (sweating: 1.55), sparkle, on back, top down view, full body
Just noticed #mermaid tags only have 2 so far, so another one.
No idea how did AI came up with high contrast color, but I kinda liked it. Attempted to make it looks like it came from visual novel.
Same generation methods as post #6240 as Waifu for txt2img and NovelAI for img2img and inpainting.
masterpiece, best quality, (official art: 1.2), (mermaid: 2.2), (white fish tail: 1.4), (loli: 1.6), (visible stomach: 1.2), looking at viewer, long hair, hair bow, tearing up, (wet clothes: 1.5), long tops, long sleeves, beret hat, streetwear, wool jacket, visible stomach, ๐ฅน, tired, (pouting: 1.5), (lying on table: 1.3), (coffee shop: 1.4), sun light, reflection, (sweating: 1.55), sparkle, on back, top down view, full body
Basically tons of inpainting and photoshop back and front (with multiple different prompt I forgot), with scaling then regenerated by set denoising strength to 0.3.
Used WaifuDiffusion (txt2img) for the base the NovelAI for majority of inpainting and img2img.
Attempted to make this looks like it came from a gacha game ๐
The main prompt is this (for both WaifuDiffusion and NovelAI):
masterpiece, best quality, (official art: 1.2), (mermaid: 1.9), (black fish tail: 1.4), (loli: 1.6), (visible stomach: 1.2), looking at viewer, magical, prism, (magical girl: 1.7), long hair, hair bow, tearing up, (wet clothes: 1.5), starry sky print, long tops, long sleeves, witch hat, cape, (pouting: 1.5), (floating: 1.3), sun light, reflection, (sweating: 1.55), sparkle, on back, top down view, full body
Negative: lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, text, error, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, cropped, worst quality, low quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, blurry, artist name
On the note of the character, I would suggest her tag being named amber_(rommilia) instead, since 1). OCs are usually tagged with the owner/creator's name as the qualifier and 2). So other users can immediately identify her to be your character.
On the note of the character, I would suggest her tag being named amber_(rommilia) instead, since 1). OCs are usually tagged with the owner/creator's name as the qualifier and 2). So other users can immediately identify her to be your character.
Either my shit is bootleg or I'm doing something wrong. I can't seem to replicate 95% of this work. Or should I even be able to? What about the rest of you?
(prompt might be off a bit because my history tab doesnt show up anymore)
prompt: masterpiece, best quality. a Camilla-FE.bin in a dress sitting at a table, by artgerm. ((hair over one eye)), purple hair, (large breasts), long hair, (thick thighs), solo, cleavage, detailed face, character focus, absurd res, detailed eyes, sexy face, [intricate details], [[photorealistic]], detailed facial features, natural lighting, sharp focus, [makeup], [[high heels]] , looking at viewer, [restaurant], indoors, [[nighttime]], purple eyes, (feet out of frame), strong legs, muscular legs
I love the way it matched the color scheme on this. Sometimes when I use NovelAI, I feel like I'm 'playing dress up' with the character but it's just so much fun.
Firstpass 0x0 just means it's automatic and that's what I'm using too. I have one weird idea left. When mixing, set model A as trinart2_step115000, B as nai-animefull-final-pruned and multiplier to 0.8. You can also check "save as float16" even though I honestly doubt it changes much.
It's "better anatomy" but yes that's the one. I mixed it 50% with r34_e4 and then 0.65 of the result with trinart. Finally I did nai * 0.7 + the_previous_mix * 0.3. Not sure if it changes much though, I was just messing around. Results are very similar to a nai * 0.8 + trinart * 0.2.
Thank you very much. I hope the drawing of ai will be more abundant
Is the f111 model used in this picture the same as 'Zeifer F111 Female Nude (better animation)? Thank you.
It's "better anatomy" but yes that's the one. I mixed it 50% with r34_e4 and then 0.65 of the result with trinart. Finally I did nai * 0.7 + the_previous_mix * 0.3. Not sure if it changes much though, I was just messing around. Results are very similar to a nai * 0.8 + trinart * 0.2.
realistic, masterpiece, high quality, highres, cute afraid loli goblin goat slave with wavy hair, cleavage cutout, small breasts, detailed face and eyes, (frills:1.2) (solo focus:1.2) pov, aroused, embarrassed, antlers, by Jeremy Lipking, by Antonio J. Manzanedo, by (Alphonse Mucha) digital painting Negative prompt: lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, text, error, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, cropped, worst quality, low quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, blurry, out of focus, censorship, ugly, old, deformed, amateur drawing, odd, fat, adult
Steps: 20, Sampler: DDIM, CFG scale: 14, Seed: 1404394528, Size: 512x960, Model hash: 45a4bfe3, Denoising strength: 0.6, First pass size: 0x0 highres fix Upscale latent space image when doing hires. fix Stop At last layers of CLIP model:1
Still got a different image - -! Maybe "First pass size: 0x0" cause?
Firstpass 0x0 just means it's automatic and that's what I'm using too. I have one weird idea left. When mixing, set model A as trinart2_step115000, B as nai-animefull-final-pruned and multiplier to 0.8. You can also check "save as float16" even though I honestly doubt it changes much.
Must be a change in how exactly the models are merged but it shouldn't matter anyway. I did a merge on the current version of the ui and got the same hash as yours [45a4bfe3]. It still generates the same image. I used highres fix with latent space upscale and CLIP:1 so maybe it's one of these settings?
My parameters:
realistic, masterpiece, high quality, highres, cute afraid loli goblin goat slave with wavy hair, cleavage cutout, small breasts, detailed face and eyes, (frills:1.2) (solo focus:1.2) pov, aroused, embarrassed, antlers, by Jeremy Lipking, by Antonio J. Manzanedo, by (Alphonse Mucha) digital painting Negative prompt: lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, text, error, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, cropped, worst quality, low quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, blurry, out of focus, censorship, ugly, old, deformed, amateur drawing, odd, fat, adult
Steps: 20, Sampler: DDIM, CFG scale: 14, Seed: 1404394528, Size: 512x960, Model hash: 45a4bfe3, Denoising strength: 0.6, First pass size: 0x0 highres fix Upscale latent space image when doing hires. fix Stop At last layers of CLIP model:1
Still got a different image - -! Maybe "First pass size: 0x0" cause?
This picture is so awesome, I want to copy it but the result is different Where you download model and What's your novelai and trinart model hash? I download animefull-final-pruned.ckpt[925997e9] and trinart2_step1150000.ckpt[f1c7e952],then merge them in stable-diffustion-webui,result animefull-final-pruned_0.8-trinart2_step115000_0.2-Weighted_sum-merged.ckpt[45a4bfe3] which not same with your model hash d0d8a399
Must be a change in how exactly the models are merged but it shouldn't matter anyway. I did a merge on the current version of the ui and got the same hash as yours [45a4bfe3]. It still generates the same image. I used highres fix with latent space upscale and CLIP:1 so maybe it's one of these settings?
This picture is so awesome, I want to copy it but the result is different Where you download model and What's your novelai and trinart model hash? I download animefull-final-pruned.ckpt[925997e9] and trinart2_step1150000.ckpt[f1c7e952],then merge them in stable-diffustion-webui,result animefull-final-pruned_0.8-trinart2_step115000_0.2-Weighted_sum-merged.ckpt[45a4bfe3] which not same with your model hash d0d8a399
Either my shit is bootleg or I'm doing something wrong. I can't seem to replicate 95% of this work. Or should I even be able to? What about the rest of you?
Where can I download this model? > nai-aminefull-final-pruned_0.8-trinart2_step115000_0.2-Weighted_Sum-merged Your art is amazing!
- get trinart and novelai from the links in the OP of any of the diffusion threads on /g/ or other boards - merge them (automatic1111's webui has a nice tool for this)
Forgot to add to the description, but found it interesting: I got the 'spoken hearts' by combining 'dirty talk' and 'heart' and it made the little hearts appear in speech bubbles. I added dirty talk to see if it would change her expression (which it also did)
So to better understand what am I doing in the program, I, out of curiousty, decided to use previous prompt but utilize custom resolution that's 1.5 larger than standard. And because of NN black box result differs much more then if I take a random tag and add {{}} (do note that if I would add :**number** to exact same tag results would also shift randomly)
1girl, (((cum))), brown hair, black eyes, nipples, small breasts, upper body, solo focus, bangs, bukakke, facial, orgy, (((cum on body))), open mouth, multiple boys, multiple penises, happy, smile, cum drip, cumpool
