Comments

[hidden]

So well, I just wrote the original commentary. Not pretending to create some literary masterpiece. Originally, I wanted to create an animal pov image with a cat stretching in front of her first person pov. Problem is AI is not on that level yet (and the animal_pov tag is so underused in imageboards it's nearly impossible to create a lora for that, lol.) That's my way of compensating what I can't physically do.

[hidden]

Hackgets said:

That's right. There is indeed a boundary. When AI sometimes generates more than six fingers, it's usually not what the user intended. But I can spout more sophistry. If there is someone who loves a sixth finger, and that is explicitly stated in the prompt, then it can hardly be called an error anymore, as if I'm a terrible fake boobs addict!

That is indeed the difference between extra digits & extra finger. When it's on purpose, it can look cool. It goes the other way around as well, missing finger looks janky since it's depicted on human characters that are (most often) known to have five, VS how some shows or furry characters are intentionally depicted to have fewer digits.

[hidden]

antlers_anon said:

We have to set the cutoff point on what is acceptable somewhere, don't we?

That's right. There is indeed a boundary. When AI sometimes generates more than six fingers, it's usually not what the user intended. But I can spout more sophistry. If there is someone who loves a sixth finger, and that is explicitly stated in the prompt, then it can hardly be called an error anymore, as if I'm a terrible fake boobs addict!

[hidden]

Hackgets said:

Isn't it strange that images of people who don't have arms get approved, but images of people who don't have five fingers can't get approved? πŸ€ͺ

We have to set the cutoff point on what is acceptable somewhere, don't we?

[hidden]

WanderingDiffusion said:

This AI Artist makes me so irrationally angry, because not only does this person watermark his AI Gens, lmao... he also doesn't label his AI gens as AI on Pixiv, claims his images are tool assisted, blows up his images through upscaling to the point where they are burned, claims he "retouches it" even though it looks like the only retouching that has been done is Adetailer on the face, and fingers, because those area's aren't as burned as the rest of the images and don't have the weird upscaling burn pattern on them indicating those have been touched after the upscaling process. Then proceeds to leave tons of other issues in other images, like fingers melting into objects, etc. I honestly would like to know what is going through this dudes head.

It's approved here so people don't seem to care about that much.

[hidden]

jerrieslulzxd said:

What was the issue with the moderation history? I don't see the problem.
Anyway, where else do you post "[your] most degenerate shit"? Not civitai I assume?

It's set to auto-delete in 3 months, and it was disinterest from approvers.
Also who tf would upload sholicon on nu-civit lmao. And tbh I dont post much anywhere, got 2 jobs and messy schedule, plus no personal interest anymore.

[hidden]

9x39mmSP5 said:
Not any time soon here, given the lukewarm reception of the concept (see moderation history of this post)
Also, I'm more focused ATM on expanding dataset for corresponding lora.

What was the issue with the moderation history? I don't see the problem.
Anyway, where else do you post "[your] most degenerate shit"? Not civitai I assume?

[hidden]

n3 said:

Is there a reason you've been using exactly 29 steps as opposed to 28? Flexing your anlas? (Assuming you're subscribed.)

Kinda figured with extra steps, there would be better details. Not sure if true or not. And yeah, I'm subscribed. Also, sorry for replying late.

[hidden]

strong_hand said:

@arujal For future reference, instead of uploading the fixed version as a new post you should request a replacement of the old one on the forums.

Oh, oops, sorry. That would’ve been better β€” I had no idea. Thanks for letting me know.

[hidden]

This AI Artist makes me so irrationally angry, because not only does this person watermark his AI Gens, lmao... he also doesn't label his AI gens as AI on Pixiv, claims his images are tool assisted, blows up his images through upscaling to the point where they are burned, claims he "retouches it" even though it looks like the only retouching that has been done is Adetailer on the face, and fingers, because those area's aren't as burned as the rest of the images and don't have the weird upscaling burn pattern on them indicating those have been touched after the upscaling process. Then proceeds to leave tons of other issues in other images, like fingers melting into objects, etc. I honestly would like to know what is going through this dudes head.

Updated by WanderingDiffusion

[hidden]

Hackgets said:

To Mods: Beware of commentary.

To prioritize something is to subordinate everything else to it. To define something as justice is to define everything else as evil. Why do they do this? Because they seek only their own survival. Yet because of this, they fight and cannot survive.

Watch Pax tube on youtube,

1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20